Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Door prize winners!
Neil Birt
Shervonda Caples
Dr. Katie Smith (Psychology)
We'll have more to give away at our next session, so be sure to join us on November 16!
iRead recap: Dr. William Brinker
South Vietnam was given a chance to create its own stable government with support from the United States. At first the U.S. sent advisors and trainers to help the South resist the Communists, but soon the conflict escalated. By 1960, the U.S. had over 500,000 combat troops there. The U.S. began withdrawing in 1973, and withdrew all troops by 1975. The author’s family had been part of the South Vietnamese who had resisted the Communist take over. They had to leave or they would have been imprisoned or killed. Bic and her family were able to board a naval vessel to get out of Vietnam before the Viet Cong took over the South.
When the U.S. withdrew in 1975, they severed all relationships with Vietnam and would not have anything to do with them, as if they did not exist. It was not until 1994 that the Clinton Administration recognized the legitimacy of the Vietnam government.
At first the Ho Chi Minh government was based on Stalinism, but it was not successful. They soon dismantled this system of government and allowed for capitalism and private enterprise. Dr. Brinker visited the country in 1988 and commented that everything was working beautifully. The Vietnamese people he met expressed no animosity toward Americans. Dr. Collier, who visited Vietnam in 2009, also indicated that here was no resentment toward Americans during his visit.
Monday, October 4, 2010
Door prize winners!
iRead recap: Video conference with Bich Minh Nguyen
Vise Library was very fortunate to sponsor a video conference via the Internet with the author of Stealing Buddha’s Dinner, Bich Minh Nguyen. Professor Nguyen is currently an Assistant Professor of English at
The story begins when her family came to the
Professor Nguyen started writing Stealing Buddha’s Dinner about 8-9 years ago after working on some essays concerning immigration. She realized that her childhood memories would make an important story about her family, their heritage, and her past experiences. She chose the genre of non-fiction as the story was “too true” for fiction or poetry. Writing a memoir allowed for the intersection of reflection and narration. She was amazed at the memories that came back to her with clarity and commented that there is a reason you can not forget something, even a hostess cupcake. Food became the primary organizing principle for the book as she realized that many of her childhood memories involved eating. Food defines who we are and what we desire. Family get togethers, birthdays, Thanksgiving and other events revolve around food not just due to the need to survive, but also to support our identity. You can learn a lot about someone just by looking in their grocery cart or refrigerator. We all have to decide what to have for dinner and are defined by what we eat in terms of who we are, what we can afford and where we come from.
The author talked about growing up in the 1980s, “a bad fashion decade,” and her desire to fit-in somewhere. These feelings of being an outsider transcend race and gender. She remembers reading Pride and Prejudice, Little Women, and the Little House on the Prairie books and relating to the characters, even though it would seem she did not have anything in common with them. She saw herself as a completely American kid, eating junk food and watching TV, but felt that other people did not see her that way. She wanted to be acknowledged as an American. The definition of being American is expansive and inclusive, but it took a long time for her to believe it applied to herself. Books empowered her and gave a sense of permission to see what is possible. She encourages reading and believes in the power of literature to find insights and understanding.
Before publishing Stealing Buddha’s Dinner, the author shared the story with her family. They were interested in seeing her perspective and it opened up communication among them. It is a risk to write the truth, but it is more meaningful if it is “close to the bone.” Readers connect to a story that is real. She sees regrets as important to acknowledge in order to gain perspective. The author wishes she had not been so shy as a child and had asked more questions. She also wishes she had learned more about her Vietnamese heritage from her grandmother.
Professor Nguyen mentioned that she had visited
There were a few questions at the end of the presentation. One person asked what her favorite food is. She said it changes a lot but right now it was bacon. She mentioned eating a candy bar with bacon wrapped in chocolate which she described as worth trying, but a little strange. She likes sweet and salty and is especially fond of ice cream, cakes, cookies, and mac & cheese. Professor Nguyen wanted to know the favorite food of the student and it turns out it is also bacon.
The author was also asked about her current writing project which is a novel about a Laura Ingalls Wilder scholar. She has always been obsessed with the Little House on the Prairie books and believes in following her obsessions. Her latest novel, Short Girls, was published in 2009. It is a work of fiction so there is a lot of friction and conflict. Some people in her family thought she was writing about them but it is not a true story. She commented that “fiction is a lot more dangerous than non-fiction.”
She was also asked about her process in writing Stealing Buddha’s Dinner. Professor Nguyen said she wrote each chapter on its own and it was not until the 5th or 6th revision that she realized that food would be the organizing principle. As she wrote, she hoped the ending would reveal itself which it did and she wrote the final two chapters last. The author commented that the writing process is long and not straightforward. There is a lot of revision. She cautioned never to turn the first draft as it takes several drafts to say what you want to say. “Authors write not to be understood, but to understand.”
Professor Nguyen concluded with a few remarks about the value of attending college. She vividly remembers being a college freshman and said it was the best year of her life. Even though she was just a couple hours away from home, it seemed so far away and she was on her own. She commented how great it was that you could take whatever classes you wanted and that there were so many interesting subjects to explore. She enjoyed going to the library to look things up and to “get lost in a book.” College is a great time to find out what interests you and she sees great value in attending college just for the fun of learning. Jobs and careers will come, but it is important to explore ideas while you have the opportunity. She was the first in her family to attend college and she sees this time as a “profound gift.”
A DVD of this video conference is on reserve at the Vise Library.